Re: [PATCH 06/18] t5613: clarify "too deep" recursion tests

> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:52:19PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
>> >> >> > +# Note: These tests depend on the hard-coded value of 5 as "too deep". We start
>> >> >> > +# the depth at 0 and count links, not repositories, so in a chain like:
>> >> >> > +#
>> >> >> > +#   A -> B -> C -> D -> E -> F -> G -> H
>> >> >> > +#      0    1    2    3    4    5    6
>> >> >> > +#
>> [...]
>> > No, we count links, not repositories. So the "A->B" link is "0", "B->C"
>> > is "1", and so on.
>>
>> If you need to re-roll for some other reason I would add some spaces
>> around the numbers so they line up better with the links so that this
>> becomes more clear.
>
> Hmm. Now I am puzzled, because I _did_ line up them specifically to make
> this clear. I put the numbers under the ">" of the arrow. Did I screw up
> the spacing somehow so that isn't how they look to you? Or are you just
> saying you would prefer them under the "-" of the arrow?
>
> -Peff