Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] pack-objects: show some progress when counting kept objects
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2018, 18:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87d109qh51.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180306104158.6541-5-pclouds@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 06 2018, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy jotted:
Show 11 quoted lines
> We only show progress when there are new objects to be packed. But > when --keep-pack is specified on the base pack, we will exclude most > of objects. This makes 'pack-objects' stay silent for a long time > while the counting phase is going. > > Let's show some progress whenever we visit an object instead. The > number of packed objects will be shown after if it's not the same as > the number of visited objects. > > Since the meaning of this number has changed, use another word instead > of "Counting" to hint about the change.
Can you elaborate on how the meaning has changed? With/without this on linux.git I get:
With:
Enumerating objects: 5901144, done.
Getting object details: 100% (5901145/5901145), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.Without:
Counting objects: 5901145, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.So now we're seemingly off-by-one but otherwise doing the same thing?
As for as user feedback goes we might as well have said "Reticulating splines", but I have some bias towards keeping the current "Counting objects..." phrasing. We ourselves have other docs referring to it that aren't changed by this patch, and there's e.g. https://githubengineering.com/counting-objects/ and lots of other 3rd party docs that refer to this.