Re: [PATCH] Teach "git add" and friends to be paranoid
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 22, 2010, 06:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwry5pxg8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100222033553.GA10191@dpotapov.dyndns.org>
Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> writes:
> If you look at speed-up numbers, you can think that the numbers are > unstable, but in fact, the best time in 5 runs does not differ more > than 0.01s between those trials. But because difference for >=128Kb > is 0.05s or less, the accuracy of the above numbers is less than 25%.
Then wouldn't it make the following statement...
> But overall the outcome is clear -- read() is always a winner.
"... a winner, below 128kB; above that the difference is within noise and measurement error"?
> It would be interesting to see what difference Nehalem, which has a > smaller but much faster L2 cache than Core 2. It may perform better > at larger sizes up to 256Kb.
Interesting.