Re: Unapplied patches reminder
Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Junio, I saw these patches and thought what they try to do were
> sensible, but I don't them in your tree. I didn't see much discussion
> on most of them, either.
>
> Because I don't read C very well, I may have listed some patches
> here that you may have discarded because the code was no good, and
> if so I apologize for wasting your time, but I thought at least
> some of them should be salvaged.
> ...
> From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra@aei.mpg.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: clean block-sha1/ directory instead of mozilla-sha1/
> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:32:19 +0200
>
> 'make clean' should remove the object files from block-sha1/
> instead of the non-existent mozilla-sha1/ directory.
This was lost in the noise, and it is an obviously correct patch.
Thanks for a reminder.
Show 7 quoted lines
> From: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] push: fix usage: --tags is incompatible with --all and --mirror
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:39:05 +0200
> Message-ID: <4AD75029.1010109@gmail.com>
>
> Correct the usage text to make it clear that --tags cannot
> be combined with --all or --mirror.
Show 8 quoted lines
> From: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
> Subject: [PATCH] describe: load refnames before calling describe()
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:30:48 +0200
> Message-ID: <4AD9F138.3080405@lsrfire.ath.cx>
>
> Get rid of the static variable that was used to prevent loading all
> the refnames multiple times by moving that code out of describe(),
> simply making sure it is only run once that way.