Re: Unapplied patches reminder

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Oct 18, 2009, 23:32 UTC
Message-ID: <7viqecgtx8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091019052030.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>

Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes:

Show 18 quoted lines

> Junio, I saw these patches and thought what they try to do were 
> sensible, but I don't them in your tree. I didn't see much discussion 
> on most of them, either.
>
> Because I don't read C very well, I may have listed some patches 
> here that you may have discarded because the code was no good, and 
> if so I apologize for wasting your time, but I thought at least 
> some of them should be salvaged.
> ...
> From: "Tom G. Christensen" <tgc@statsbiblioteket.dk>
> Subject: [PATCH] NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER should behave more like ExtUtils::MakeMaker
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:14:31 +0200
> Message-ID: <1255432471-14168-1-git-send-email-tgc@statsbiblioteket.dk>
>
>     This change makes NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER behave more as ExtUtils::MakeMaker
>     by installing the modules into the perl libdir and not $(prefix)/lib.
>     It will default to sitelib but will allow the user to choose by setting
>     the INSTALLDIRS variable which is also honored by ExtUtils::MakeMaker.

I still have this in my inbox, but I tend to wait for Acks to patches that touch perl/ area before acting on them, which hasn't happened.

P.S. Originally I somehow mistook this from tchrist (aka thoth) and blindly applied, but then realized it is a different Tom with slightly different family name and recategorized the patch to go through the usual review cycle.