Re: [PATCH] Introduce 'git-format-patch --suffix=patch'
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 17, 2007, 19:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vps9dqvdq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <D085A8A2-F1EC-47EC-8D96-B8A06E483BDB@silverinsanity.com>
Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I think that the best form of DWIM is that if the suffix is "", then > you simply skip the entire sprintf. Then any suffix has to have the > '.', but no suffix doesn't have it. Additional DWIMMmery could > remove an initial '.' from the suffix so that users expecting it to > be there don't get ".." in their file.
I think it is generally accepted on this list that that kind of DWIMmery is bad.