Re: [PATCH 2/3] refactor: use bitsizeof() instead of 8 * sizeof()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2009, 05:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vljmg56am.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090723051112.GA9372@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:09:56PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:34:34PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >> > >> >> #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])) >> >> +#define bitsizeof(x) (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(x)) >> > >> > Isn't our style to use all-caps for macros? I.e., BITSIZEOF? >> >> Perhaps but I'd say similarity between sizeof() and bitsizeof() calls for >> consistency in the lowercase in this particular case. > > Fair enough. I just wanted to point it out in case nobody thought of it.
I've actually thought of using elemof() to call what is known as ARRAY_SIZE() when we introduced it, but now it is way _too_ late ;-)