Re: [PATCH 2/3] refactor: use bitsizeof() instead of 8 * sizeof()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2009, 05:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3a8o6l3v.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090723050711.GB9189@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:34:34PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >> #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])) >> +#define bitsizeof(x) (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(x)) > > Isn't our style to use all-caps for macros? I.e., BITSIZEOF?
Perhaps but I'd say similarity between sizeof() and bitsizeof() calls for consistency in the lowercase in this particular case.