Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 19, 2005, 00:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vek5deam6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511181520390.13959@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> Of course, you could equally easily (more so?) make it just a commit > trigger instead, which might well be the right thing.
I think it is the right approach. As I repeatedly said (not that repeating things makes them right) on this list, I think that the interpretation of what is in commit log is a policy issue that is local to each project.
> (And that still leaves the question open what to do about patches and > pulls, but if people mainly worry about newly written commit messages > itself, then at least that part is unambiguous).
Pulls are "too late, sorry you have to live with it"; for patches, mailinfo and am have -u (I do not remember if I added it to applymbox -- I do not use applymbox anymore myself). Maybe we should make -u the default and countermand with -U to encourage the use of utf8 further?