Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] fast-export: avoid importing blob marks
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 12, 2012, 17:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vbof2k96j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121111163827.GA11408@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> Major issue: "echo -n" is still not portable. >> >> Could we simply use >> >> touch marks-cur && >> touch marks-new > > Yes, "echo -n" is definitely not portable. Our preferred way of > creating an empty file is just ">file".
Yes.
And it is misleading to use "touch" in this case; unless you are updating the timestamp of an existing file while preserving the contents of it, please don't use the command.
Thanks.