Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/test-lib.sh: Let test_must_fail fail on signals only
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 16, 2008, 05:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4p6qwezy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080716051829.GB4030@segfault.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> This is probably a fine protective measure, and it looks like Junio has > already applied it. But shouldn't any git commands returning such values > be fixed? Which commands return such bogus error codes?
Anything that returns error() from its cmd_xxx() routine, for example, would end up exiting with (-1). Is it "such bogus" error codes, though?
I am somewhat tired tonight, so I'll leave it up to the list to do the grepping and go to bed ;-)