From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:54:25 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/test-lib.sh: Let test_must_fail fail on signals only
Message-ID: <7v4p6qwezy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080716051829.GB4030@segfault.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> This is probably a fine protective measure, and it looks like Junio has
> already applied it. But shouldn't any git commands returning such values
> be fixed? Which commands return such bogus error codes?

Anything that returns error() from its cmd_xxx() routine, for example,
would end up exiting with (-1).  Is it "such bogus" error codes, though?

I am somewhat tired tonight, so I'll leave it up to the list to do the
grepping and go to bed ;-)