Re: [PATCHv3 0/5]rev-list and friends: --min-parents, --max-parents
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 23, 2011, 17:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4o6tg3qo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110323144835.GA30337@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
>> Junio, please let me/us know whether sending an amended series in this way >> (which I've seen before) is actually convenient for you or not. !squash >> commits require a message edit, for example. OTOH, I don't know any (other?) >> good inter diff solution. > > As a reviewer, I find it is usually most convenient to just have the > submitter do the squash, and then write below the "---" (or in a cover > letter like this) a brief explanation of the differences. > > Yeah, I end up reading the whole patch again, including bits I already > read, but that is probably a good thing. A good patch is hopefully not > too long, and it is easier (to me, anyway) to review it as a whole and > not as an interdiff.
Yes. And that would also make it easier for people who didn't read the earlier round to double check.