Re: [PATCH 1/3] revision.c: introduce --min-parents and --max-parents
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 18, 2011, 21:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1v24w2dq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110318204854.GA23331@elie>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Is there a reason not to choose a convention for which > > rev.max_parents = 1; > > works?
I also hate the peculiar convention used in this patch. Is it worth this ugliness to avoid adding a line in init_revisions() to initialize it to the infinity value?