Re: [PATCH/RFD 0/2] revision.c: --merges, --no-merges and --merges-only
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 17, 2011, 19:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110317195905.GG20508@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <cover.1300359256.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:33:56PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> This mini series makes it so that --no-merges undoes --merges > and vice versa, as the user should be able to expect, > and that --merges-only is a separate option.
Having recently been confused by this (and frustrated at the lack of an equivalent to your new "--merges"), I do think the result is better.
However, this is totally changing the meaning of an option to plumbing like rev-list (among others). Is it worth the breakage? If so, what's the migration plan? Did I miss a discussion somewhere?
-Peff