Re: [PATCH v2] Fix notes handling in rev-list
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 17, 2012, 03:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1ukbys0n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120717031727.GA20945@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> ... But whatever we call it, I think it is an > improvement.
I didn't say it makes things worse in any way, did I?
I was reacting on the Subject: line because that will what I later have to work from when reading shortlog, summarizing changes, etc.
Show 5 quoted lines
> ... I don't think one more option is going to > break the camel's back, but I wonder if "rev-list -h" could use some > cleanup. E.g., maybe drop seldom used stuff like --bisect-vars, format > similar options on a single line to save space, and add in some missing > options.
Sounds good. The manpage also needs some cleaning up, I would think, to omit things that may happen to work (primarily because a lot of code is shared with "log") but do not have to, for example.