Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] t0060: verify that basename() and dirname() work as expected
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- Date
- Jan 13, 2016, 00:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5695A132.1040100@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7d73267984ab029df022477e341c536e111eafdd.1452585382.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
On 12/01/16 07:57, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 99 quoted lines
> Unfortunately, some libgen implementations yield outcomes different
> from what Git expects. For example, mingw-w64-crt provides a basename()
> function, that shortens `path0/` to `path`!
>
> So let's verify that the basename() and dirname() functions we use
> conform to what Git expects.
>
> Derived-from-code-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> t/t0060-path-utils.sh | 3 +
> test-path-utils.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 169 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> index 627ef85..f0152a7 100755
> --- a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> +++ b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ case $(uname -s) in
> ;;
> esac
>
> +test_expect_success basename 'test-path-utils basename'
> +test_expect_success dirname 'test-path-utils dirname'
> +
> norm_path "" ""
> norm_path . ""
> norm_path ./ ""
> diff --git a/test-path-utils.c b/test-path-utils.c
> index c67bf65..4ab68ac 100644
> --- a/test-path-utils.c
> +++ b/test-path-utils.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,166 @@ static void normalize_argv_string(const char **var, const char *input)
> die("Bad value: %s\n", input);
> }
>
> +struct test_data {
> + const char *from; /* input: transform from this ... */
> + const char *to; /* output: ... to this. */
> +};
> +
> +static int test_function(struct test_data *data, char *(*func)(char *input),
> + const char *funcname)
> +{
> + int failed = 0, i;
> + char buffer[1024];
> + char *to;
> +
> + for (i = 0; data[i].to; i++) {
> + if (!data[i].from)
> + to = func(NULL);
> + else {
> + strcpy(buffer, data[i].from);
> + to = func(buffer);
> + }
> + if (strcmp(to, data[i].to)) {
> + error("FAIL: %s(%s) => '%s' != '%s'\n",
> + funcname, data[i].from, to, data[i].to);
> + failed = 1;
> + }
> + }
> + return failed;
> +}
> +
> +static struct test_data basename_data[] = {
> + /* --- POSIX type paths --- */
> + { NULL, "." },
> + { "", "." },
> + { ".", "." },
> + { "..", ".." },
> + { "/", "/" },
> +#if defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(NO_LIBGEN_H)
> + { "//", "//" },
> + { "///", "//" },
> + { "////", "//" },
> +#else
> + { "//", "/" },
> + { "///", "/" },
> + { "////", "/" },
> +#endif
> + { "usr", "usr" },
> + { "/usr", "usr" },
> + { "/usr/", "usr" },
> + { "/usr//", "usr" },
> + { "/usr/lib", "lib" },
> + { "usr/lib", "lib" },
> + { "usr/lib///", "lib" },
> +
> +#if defined(__MINGW32__) || defined(_MSC_VER)
> +
> + /* --- win32 type paths --- */
> + { "\\usr", "usr" },
> + { "\\usr\\", "usr" },
> + { "\\usr\\\\", "usr" },
> + { "\\usr\\lib", "lib" },
> + { "usr\\lib", "lib" },
> + { "usr\\lib\\\\\\", "lib" },
> + { "C:/usr", "usr" },
> + { "C:/usr", "usr" },This duplication was in the test-libgen.c file I sent you ... so, my bad. ;-)
Did you not have more tests to add?
ATB, Ramsay Jones