Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Make boundary characters for --color-words configurable
- From
Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 6, 2008, 00:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46dff0320805051740o65eee07eqc7073e4fa7996277@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <46dff0320805050510t3bc5fd0eq44e0d58d1bb57629@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > The one-char-one-token and multi-char-one-token rules may have > different implementation issues. I think multi-char-one-token rule may > be more representative. So for the current time, i prefer considering > both run of word characters and single non-word character as a token. >
If we agree on this. I will come up with an implementation still using diff.nonwordchars few days later.
-- Ping Yin