From: Ping Yin Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 00:40:15 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Make boundary characters for --color-words configurable Message-ID: <46dff0320805051740o65eee07eqc7073e4fa7996277@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46dff0320805050510t3bc5fd0eq44e0d58d1bb57629@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Ping Yin wrote: > > The one-char-one-token and multi-char-one-token rules may have > different implementation issues. I think multi-char-one-token rule may > be more representative. So for the current time, i prefer considering > both run of word characters and single non-word character as a token. > If we agree on this. I will come up with an implementation still using diff.nonwordchars few days later. -- Ping Yin