Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cat-file: add --batch-command mode
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2022, 11:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20a951f4-ac68-639e-0a4c-24f8f7668d47@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1b63164ad4d9ec6b5fa6f733b6095b2779298b36.1644251611.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Hi John
On 07/02/2022 16:33, John Cai via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 65 quoted lines
> From: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com> > > Add a new flag --batch-command that accepts commands and arguments > from stdin, similar to git-update-ref --stdin. > > At GitLab, we use a pair of long running cat-file processes when > accessing object content. One for iterating over object metadata with > --batch-check, and the other to grab object contents with --batch. > > However, if we had --batch-command, we wouldn't need to keep both > processes around, and instead just have one --batch-command process > where we can flip between getting object info, and getting object > contents. Since we have a pair of cat-file processes per repository, > this means we can get rid of roughly half of long lived git cat-file > processes. Given there are many repositories being accessed at any given > time, this can lead to huge savings since on a given server. > > git cat-file --batch-command > > will enter an interactive command mode whereby the user can enter in > commands and their arguments that get queued in memory: > > <command1> [arg1] [arg2] NL > <command2> [arg1] [arg2] NL > > When --buffer mode is used, commands will be queued in memory until a > flush command is issued that execute them: > > flush NL > > The reason for a flush command is that when a consumer process (A) > talks to a git cat-file process (B) and interactively writes to and > reads from it in --buffer mode, (A) needs to be able to control when > the buffer is flushed to stdout. > > Currently, from (A)'s perspective, the only way is to either > > 1. kill (B)'s process > 2. send an invalid object to stdin. > > 1. is not ideal from a performance perspective as it will require > spawning a new cat-file process each time, and 2. is hacky and not a > good long term solution. > > With this mechanism of queueing up commands and letting (A) issue a > flush command, process (A) can control when the buffer is flushed and > can guarantee it will receive all of the output when in --buffer mode. > > This patch adds the basic structure for adding command which can be > extended in the future to add more commands. It also adds the following > two commands (on top of the flush command): > > contents <object> NL > info <object> NL > > The contents command takes an <object> argument and prints out the object > contents. > > The info command takes a <object> argument and prints out the object > metadata. > > These can be used in the following way with --buffer: > > contents <sha1> NL > object <sha1> NL
There is no object command
>[...]
Show 53 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t1006-cat-file.sh b/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
> index 145eee11df9..c57a35ea20a 100755
> --- a/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
> +++ b/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
> @@ -177,6 +177,20 @@ $content"
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> + test -z "$content" ||
> + test_expect_success "--batch-command output of $type content is correct" '
> + maybe_remove_timestamp "$batch_output" $no_ts >expect &&
> + maybe_remove_timestamp "$(test_write_lines "contents $sha1" \
> + | git cat-file --batch-command)" $no_ts >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> + '
> +
> + test_expect_success "--batch-command output of $type info is correct" '
> + echo "$sha1 $type $size" >expect &&
> + test_write_lines "info $sha1" | git cat-file --batch-command >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> + '
> +
> test_expect_success "custom --batch-check format" '
> echo "$type $sha1" >expect &&
> echo $sha1 | git cat-file --batch-check="%(objecttype) %(objectname)" >actual &&
> @@ -213,6 +227,64 @@ $content"
> '
> }
>
> +run_buffer_test_flush () {
> + type=$1
> + sha1=$2
> + size=$3
> +
> + mkfifo input &&
> + test_when_finished 'rm input; exec 8<&-' &&
> + mkfifo output &&
> + exec 9<>output &&
> + test_when_finished 'rm output; exec 9<&-'
> + (
> + git cat-file --buffer --batch-command <input 2>err &
> + echo $! &&
> + wait $!
> + ) >&9 &
> + sh_pid=$! &&
> + read cat_file_pid <&9 &&
> + test_when_finished "kill $cat_file_pid
> + kill $sh_pid; wait $sh_pid; :" &&
> + echo "$sha1 $type $size" >expect &&
> + test_write_lines "info $sha1" flush "info $sha1" >input
> + # TODO - consume all available input, not just one
> + # line (see above).
> + # check output is flushed on exitThis test seems to have lost some code above this comment so the comment is no longer correct - we do not test if the output is flushed on exit and looking at the implementation I don't think it is.
Best Wishes
Phillip
Show 207 quoted lines
> + read actual <&9 &&
> + echo "$actual" >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual &&
> + test_must_be_empty err
> +}
> +
> +run_buffer_test_no_flush () {
> + type=$1
> + sha1=$2
> + size=$3
> +
> + touch output &&
> + test_when_finished 'rm output' &&
> + mkfifo input &&
> + test_when_finished 'rm input' &&
> + mkfifo pid &&
> + exec 9<>pid &&
> + test_when_finished 'rm pid; exec 9<&-'
> + (
> + git cat-file --buffer --batch-command <input >output &
> + echo $! &&
> + wait $!
> + echo $?
> + ) >&9 &
> + sh_pid=$! &&
> + read cat_file_pid <&9 &&
> + test_when_finished "kill $cat_file_pid
> + kill $sh_pid; wait $sh_pid; :" &&
> + test_write_lines "info $sha1" "info $sha1" &&
> + kill $cat_file_pid &&
> + read status <&9 &&
> + test_must_be_empty output
> +}
> +
> hello_content="Hello World"
> hello_size=$(strlen "$hello_content")
> hello_sha1=$(echo_without_newline "$hello_content" | git hash-object --stdin)
> @@ -224,6 +296,14 @@ test_expect_success "setup" '
>
> run_tests 'blob' $hello_sha1 $hello_size "$hello_content" "$hello_content"
>
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer with flush for blob info' '
> + run_buffer_test_flush blob $hello_sha1 $hello_size
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer without flush for blob info' '
> + run_buffer_test_no_flush blob $hello_sha1 $hello_size false
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success '--batch-check without %(rest) considers whole line' '
> echo "$hello_sha1 blob $hello_size" >expect &&
> git update-index --add --cacheinfo 100644 $hello_sha1 "white space" &&
> @@ -238,6 +318,14 @@ tree_pretty_content="100644 blob $hello_sha1 hello"
>
> run_tests 'tree' $tree_sha1 $tree_size "" "$tree_pretty_content"
>
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer with flush for tree info' '
> + run_buffer_test_flush tree $tree_sha1 $tree_size
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer without flush for tree info' '
> + run_buffer_test_no_flush tree $tree_sha1 $tree_size false
> +'
> +
> commit_message="Initial commit"
> commit_sha1=$(echo_without_newline "$commit_message" | git commit-tree $tree_sha1)
> commit_size=$(($(test_oid hexsz) + 137))
> @@ -249,6 +337,14 @@ $commit_message"
>
> run_tests 'commit' $commit_sha1 $commit_size "$commit_content" "$commit_content" 1
>
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer with flush for commit info' '
> + run_buffer_test_flush commit $commit_sha1 $commit_size
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer without flush for commit info' '
> + run_buffer_test_no_flush commit $commit_sha1 $commit_size false
> +'
> +
> tag_header_without_timestamp="object $hello_sha1
> type blob
> tag hellotag
> @@ -263,11 +359,19 @@ tag_size=$(strlen "$tag_content")
>
> run_tests 'tag' $tag_sha1 $tag_size "$tag_content" "$tag_content" 1
>
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer with flush for tag info' '
> + run_buffer_test_flush tag $tag_sha1 $tag_size
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success PIPE '--batch-command --buffer without flush for tag info' '
> + run_buffer_test_no_flush tag $tag_sha1 $tag_size false
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success \
> "Reach a blob from a tag pointing to it" \
> "test '$hello_content' = \"\$(git cat-file blob $tag_sha1)\""
>
> -for batch in batch batch-check
> +for batch in batch batch-check batch-command
> do
> for opt in t s e p
> do
> @@ -373,6 +477,62 @@ test_expect_success "--batch-check with multiple sha1s gives correct format" '
> "$(echo_without_newline "$batch_check_input" | git cat-file --batch-check)"
> '
>
> +batch_command_info_input="info $hello_sha1
> +info $tree_sha1
> +info $commit_sha1
> +info $tag_sha1
> +info deadbeef
> +info
> +flush
> +"
> +
> +test_expect_success "--batch-command with multiple info calls gives correct format" '
> + test "$batch_check_output" = "$(echo_without_newline \
> + "$batch_command_info_input" | git cat-file --batch-command --buffer)"
> +'
> +
> +batch_command_contents_input="contents $hello_sha1
> +contents $commit_sha1
> +contents $tag_sha1
> +contents deadbeef
> +contents
> +flush
> +"
> +
> +test_expect_success "--batch-command with multiple contents calls gives correct format" '
> + test "$(maybe_remove_timestamp "$batch_output" 1)" = \
> + "$(maybe_remove_timestamp "$(echo_without_newline "$batch_command_contents_input" | git cat-file --batch-command)" 1)"
> +'
> +
> +batch_command_mixed_input="info $hello_sha1
> +contents $hello_sha1
> +info $commit_sha1
> +contents $commit_sha1
> +info $tag_sha1
> +contents $tag_sha1
> +contents deadbeef
> +info
> +flush
> +"
> +
> +batch_command_mixed_output="$hello_sha1 blob $hello_size
> +$hello_sha1 blob $hello_size
> +$hello_content
> +$commit_sha1 commit $commit_size
> +$commit_sha1 commit $commit_size
> +$commit_content
> +$tag_sha1 tag $tag_size
> +$tag_sha1 tag $tag_size
> +$tag_content
> +deadbeef missing
> + missing"
> +
> +test_expect_success "--batch-command with mixed calls gives correct format" '
> + test "$(maybe_remove_timestamp "$batch_command_mixed_output" 1)" = \
> + "$(maybe_remove_timestamp "$(echo_without_newline \
> + "$batch_command_mixed_input" | git cat-file --batch-command --buffer)" 1)"
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success 'setup blobs which are likely to delta' '
> test-tool genrandom foo 10240 >foo &&
> { cat foo && echo plus; } >foo-plus &&
> @@ -963,5 +1123,40 @@ test_expect_success 'cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check ignores replace'
> echo "$orig commit $orig_size" >expect &&
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
> +test_expect_success 'batch-command empty command' '
> + echo "" >cmd &&
> + test_expect_code 128 git cat-file --batch-command <cmd 2>err &&
> + grep -E "^fatal:.*empty command in input.*" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'batch-command whitespace before command' '
> + echo " info deadbeef" >cmd &&
> + test_expect_code 128 git cat-file --batch-command <cmd 2>err &&
> + grep -E "^fatal:.*whitespace before command.*" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'batch-command unknown command' '
> + echo unknown_command >cmd &&
> + test_expect_code 128 git cat-file --batch-command <cmd 2>err &&
> + grep -E "^fatal:.*unknown command.*" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'batch-command flush with arguments' '
> + echo "flush arg" >cmd &&
> + test_expect_code 128 git cat-file --batch-command --buffer <cmd 2>err &&
> + grep -E "^fatal:.*flush takes no arguments.*" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'batch-command flush without --buffer' '
> + echo "flush arg" >cmd &&
> + test_expect_code 128 git cat-file --batch-command <cmd 2>err &&
> + grep -E "^fatal:.*flush is only for --buffer mode.*" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'batch-command flush empty queue' '
> + echo flush >cmd &&
> + test_expect_code 128 git cat-file --batch-command --buffer <cmd 2>err &&
> + grep -E "^fatal:.*nothing to flush.*" err
> +'
>
> test_done