Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] bitmap-format.txt: feed the file to asciidoc to generate html

From: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 8, 2022, 15:02 UTC
Message-ID: <20220608150211.9831-1-chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6aowc6r.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> Is bitmap-format the only one that is not fed to AsciiDoc, by the
> way?  Are there other 'text-only' document that is worth converting
> to AsciiDoc? 
>
> It is outside the scope of this series, of course, to actually
> adjusting them, but since you are already doing the homework, I
> thought you might already know the answer, which may become a source
> of inspriation for others to find something to work on.

No, bitmap-format is not the only one. There are more text-only files. Some of them which I found till now are - technical/chunk-format.txt, technical/commit-graph.txt etc. There are more but I don't know if they actually need html conversion. These two texts (which I mentioned) is I think worth having html files.

I was thinking of adding those in my commit but later I thought it would divert the patch series.

Thanks :)