Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I)
- From
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
- Date
- Dec 16, 2020, 00:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20201216003408.GR36751@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20201205014607.1464119-1-emilyshaffer@google.com>
On 2020.12.04 17:45, Emily Shaffer wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Hi folks, and thanks for the patience - I ran into many, many last-mile > challenges. > > I haven't addressed many comments on the design doc yet - I was keen to get the > "functionally complete" implementation and conversion to the list. > > Next on my plate: > - Update the design doc to make sense with what's in the implementation. > - A blog post! How to set up new hooks, why they're neat, etc. > - We seem to have some Googlers interested in trying it out internally, so > I'm hoping we'll gather and collate feedback from that soon too. > - And of course addressing comments on this series. > > Thanks! > - Emily
This approach looks good to me. I'll look forward to seeing the updated design and the feedback from the internal tests.