Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 25, 2021, 19:50 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqq4ki0udu4.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlfbmi99f.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

Show 16 quoted lines

> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
>
>>> The topic branch has a lot more commits than these 17; I am
>>> wondering if the reviewed-by applies only to the bottom 17, or as
>>> the whole?  I recall that the upper half was expecting at least some
>>> documentation updates.
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Just to these 17, sorry for being unclear.
>
> Thanks for reading them through.
>
> I am tempted to say we should merge these "mechanism" part down to
> 'next', hoping that the "rewrite existing ones using the new
> mechansim" part can follow soon.

I said this on Feb 17th, but since then I think I saw you answer "I'll do that" in responses to JTan's reviews in the past few days (e.g. <YC7o2rUQOEdiMdqh@google.com>). Would I regret if I merge the topic down to 'next' today?

Thanks.