From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:34:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I)
Message-ID: <20201216003408.GR36751@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201205014607.1464119-1-emilyshaffer@google.com>

On 2020.12.04 17:45, Emily Shaffer wrote:
> Hi folks, and thanks for the patience - I ran into many, many last-mile
> challenges.
> 
> I haven't addressed many comments on the design doc yet - I was keen to get the
> "functionally complete" implementation and conversion to the list.
> 
> Next on my plate:
>  - Update the design doc to make sense with what's in the implementation.
>  - A blog post! How to set up new hooks, why they're neat, etc.
>  - We seem to have some Googlers interested in trying it out internally, so
>    I'm hoping we'll gather and collate feedback from that soon too.
>  - And of course addressing comments on this series.
> 
> Thanks!
>  - Emily

This approach looks good to me. I'll look forward to seeing the updated
design and the feedback from the internal tests.