Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 16, 2020, 00:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqlfdy6025.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20201216003408.GR36751@google.com>
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On 2020.12.04 17:45, Emily Shaffer wrote: >> Hi folks, and thanks for the patience - I ran into many, many last-mile >> challenges. >> >> I haven't addressed many comments on the design doc yet - I was keen to get the >> "functionally complete" implementation and conversion to the list. >> >> Next on my plate: >> - Update the design doc to make sense with what's in the implementation. >> - A blog post! How to set up new hooks, why they're neat, etc. >> - We seem to have some Googlers interested in trying it out internally, so >> I'm hoping we'll gather and collate feedback from that soon too. >> - And of course addressing comments on this series. >> >> Thanks! >> - Emily > > This approach looks good to me. I'll look forward to seeing the updated > design and the feedback from the internal tests.
Thanks.
By the way, es/config-hooks does not seem to pass 5411 (at least) even as a standalone topic, and has been kicked out of 'seen' for some time. Has anybody took a look into the issue?