Re: [PATCH v2] transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_push
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:53:30AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> >> + # the new branch should not have been created upstream
> >> + test_must_fail git -C "$d" rev-parse refs/heads/atomic &&
> >
> > The new branch should not have been created; if this rev-parse
> > succeeded, it would be a bug.
>
> One thing I forgot. If refs/heads/atomic did not exist, but say
> refs/tags/refs/heads/atomic did, the rev-parse would succeed, which
> is a rather unfortunate source of confusion.
>
> Of course, we know we have never touched "$d" to cause such a funny
> tag, so rev-parse is good enough in practice, but
>
> git -C "$d" show-ref --verify refs/heads/atomic
>
> would not dwim (its --verify mode was invented specifically for
> rectifying this issue with rev-parse, if I recall correctly), and is
> more appropriate best-practice version to write here, especially if
> we anticipate that future developers and Git users would treat this
> line as an example to mimic.
>
> > Up to point, I have no possible improvements to offer ;-)
> > Very well done.
>
> So, I lied, but still the tests looked quite well done.
Oh, that's very interesting! Thanks for pointing it out. :)
Reroll coming in a few. Thanks, Junio.
- Emily