git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v5 6/7] revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithm

From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 1, 2018, 13:46 UTC
Message-ID
<20181101134623.84055-7-dstolee@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To
<20181101134623.84055-1-dstolee@microsoft.com>

The current --topo-order algorithm requires walking all reachable commits up front, topo-sorting them, all before outputting the first value. This patch introduces a new algorithm which uses stored generation numbers to incrementally walk in topo-order, outputting commits as we go. This can dramatically reduce the computation time to write a fixed number of commits, such as when limiting with "-n <N>" or filling the first page of a pager.

When running a command like 'git rev-list --topo-order HEAD', Git performed the following steps:

1. Run limit_list(), which parses all reachable commits,
   adds them to a linked list, and distributes UNINTERESTING
   flags. If all unprocessed commits are UNINTERESTING, then
   it may terminate without walking all reachable commits.
   This does not occur if we do not specify UNINTERESTING
   commits.
2. Run sort_in_topological_order(), which is an implementation
   of Kahn's algorithm. It first iterates through the entire
   set of important commits and computes the in-degree of each
   (plus one, as we use 'zero' as a special value here). Then,
   we walk the commits in priority order, adding them to the
   priority queue if and only if their in-degree is one. As
   we remove commits from this priority queue, we decrement the
   in-degree of their parents.
3. While we are peeling commits for output, get_revision_1()
   uses pop_commit on the full list of commits computed by
   sort_in_topological_order().

In the new algorithm, these three steps correspond to three different commit walks. We run these walks simultaneously, and advance each only as far as necessary to satisfy the requirements of the 'higher order' walk. We know when we can pause each walk by using generation numbers from the commit- graph feature.

Recall that the generation number of a commit satisfies:
* If the commit has at least one parent, then the generation
  number is one more than the maximum generation number among
  its parents.
* If the commit has no parent, then the generation number is one.
There are two special generation numbers:
* GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY: this value is 0xffffffff and
  indicates that the commit is not stored in the commit-graph and
  the generation number was not previously calculated.
* GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO: this value (0) is a special indicator
  to say that the commit-graph was generated by a version of Git
  that does not compute generation numbers (such as v2.18.0).

Since we use generation_numbers_enabled() before using the new algorithm, we do not need to worry about GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO. However, the existence of GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY implies the following weaker statement than the usual we expect from generation numbers:

    If A and B are commits with generation numbers gen(A) and
    gen(B) and gen(A) < gen(B), then A cannot reach B.

Thus, we will walk in each of our stages until the "maximum unexpanded generation number" is strictly lower than the generation number of a commit we are about to use.

The walks are as follows:
1. EXPLORE: using the explore_queue priority queue (ordered by
   maximizing the generation number), parse each reachable
   commit until all commits in the queue have generation
   number strictly lower than needed. During this walk, update
   the UNINTERESTING flags as necessary.
2. INDEGREE: using the indegree_queue priority queue (ordered
   by maximizing the generation number), add one to the in-
   degree of each parent for each commit that is walked. Since
   we walk in order of decreasing generation number, we know
   that discovering an in-degree value of 0 means the value for
   that commit was not initialized, so should be initialized to
   two. (Recall that in-degree value "1" is what we use to say a
   commit is ready for output.) As we iterate the parents of a
   commit during this walk, ensure the EXPLORE walk has walked
   beyond their generation numbers.
3. TOPO: using the topo_queue priority queue (ordered based on
   the sort_order given, which could be commit-date, author-
   date, or typical topo-order which treats the queue as a LIFO
   stack), remove a commit from the queue and decrement the
   in-degree of each parent. If a parent has an in-degree of
   one, then we add it to the topo_queue. Before we decrement
   the in-degree, however, ensure the INDEGREE walk has walked
   beyond that generation number.
The implementations of these walks are in the following methods:
* explore_walk_step and explore_to_depth
* indegree_walk_step and compute_indegrees_to_depth
* next_topo_commit and expand_topo_walk

These methods have some patterns that may seem strange at first, but they are probably carry-overs from their equivalents in limit_list and sort_in_topological_order.

One thing that is missing from this implementation is a proper way to stop walking when the entire queue is UNINTERESTING, so this implementation is not enabled by comparisions, such as in 'git rev-list --topo-order A..B'. This can be updated in the future.

In my local testing, I used the following Git commands on the Linux repository in three modes: HEAD~1 with no commit-graph, HEAD~1 with a commit-graph, and HEAD with a commit-graph. This allows comparing the benefits we get from parsing commits from the commit-graph and then again the benefits we get by restricting the set of commits we walk.

Test: git rev-list --topo-order -100 HEAD
HEAD~1, no commit-graph: 6.80 s
HEAD~1, w/ commit-graph: 0.77 s
  HEAD, w/ commit-graph: 0.02 s
Test: git rev-list --topo-order -100 HEAD -- tools
HEAD~1, no commit-graph: 9.63 s
HEAD~1, w/ commit-graph: 6.06 s
  HEAD, w/ commit-graph: 0.06 s

This speedup is due to a few things. First, the new generation- number-enabled algorithm walks commits on order of the number of results output (subject to some branching structure expectations). Since we limit to 100 results, we are running a query similar to filling a single page of results. Second, when specifying a path, we must parse the root tree object for each commit we walk. The previous benefits from the commit-graph are entirely from reading the commit-graph instead of parsing commits. Since we need to parse trees for the same number of commits as before, we slow down significantly from the non-path-based query.

For the test above, I specifically selected a path that is changed frequently, including by merge commits. A less-frequently-changed path (such as 'README') has similar end-to-end time since we need to walk the same number of commits (before determining we do not have 100 hits). However, get the benefit that the output is presented to the user as it is discovered, much the same as a normal 'git log' command (no '--topo-order'). This is an improved user experience, even if the command has the same runtime.

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
---
 object.h   |   4 +-
 revision.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 revision.h |   2 +
 3 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/object.h b/object.h
index 0feb90ae61..796792cb32 100644
--- a/object.h
+++ b/object.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct object_array {
 
 /*
  * object flag allocation:
- * revision.h:               0---------10                              2526
+ * revision.h:               0---------10                              25----28
  * fetch-pack.c:             01
  * negotiator/default.c:       2--5
  * walker.c:                 0-2
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct object_array {
  * builtin/show-branch.c:    0-------------------------------------------26
  * builtin/unpack-objects.c:                                 2021
  */
-#define FLAG_BITS  27
+#define FLAG_BITS  29
 
 /*
  * The object type is stored in 3 bits.
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 36458265a0..4ef47d2fb4 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include "argv-array.h"
 #include "commit-reach.h"
 #include "commit-graph.h"
+#include "prio-queue.h"
 
 volatile show_early_output_fn_t show_early_output;
 
@@ -2895,31 +2896,215 @@ static int mark_uninteresting(const struct object_id *oid,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct topo_walk_info {};
+define_commit_slab(indegree_slab, int);
+define_commit_slab(author_date_slab, timestamp_t);
+
+struct topo_walk_info {
+	uint32_t min_generation;
+	struct prio_queue explore_queue;
+	struct prio_queue indegree_queue;
+	struct prio_queue topo_queue;
+	struct indegree_slab indegree;
+	struct author_date_slab author_date;
+};
+
+static inline void test_flag_and_insert(struct prio_queue *q, struct commit *c, int flag)
+{
+	if (c->object.flags & flag)
+		return;
+
+	c->object.flags |= flag;
+	prio_queue_put(q, c);
+}
+
+static void explore_walk_step(struct rev_info *revs)
+{
+	struct topo_walk_info *info = revs->topo_walk_info;
+	struct commit_list *p;
+	struct commit *c = prio_queue_get(&info->explore_queue);
+
+	if (!c)
+		return;
+
+	if (parse_commit_gently(c, 1) < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (revs->sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_AUTHOR_DATE)
+		record_author_date(&info->author_date, c);
+
+	if (revs->max_age != -1 && (c->date < revs->max_age))
+		c->object.flags |= UNINTERESTING;
+
+	if (process_parents(revs, c, NULL, NULL) < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (c->object.flags & UNINTERESTING)
+		mark_parents_uninteresting(c);
+
+	for (p = c->parents; p; p = p->next)
+		test_flag_and_insert(&info->explore_queue, p->item, TOPO_WALK_EXPLORED);
+}
+
+static void explore_to_depth(struct rev_info *revs,
+			     uint32_t gen_cutoff)
+{
+	struct topo_walk_info *info = revs->topo_walk_info;
+	struct commit *c;
+	while ((c = prio_queue_peek(&info->explore_queue)) &&
+	       c->generation >= gen_cutoff)
+		explore_walk_step(revs);
+}
+
+static void indegree_walk_step(struct rev_info *revs)
+{
+	struct commit_list *p;
+	struct topo_walk_info *info = revs->topo_walk_info;
+	struct commit *c = prio_queue_get(&info->indegree_queue);
+
+	if (!c)
+		return;
+
+	if (parse_commit_gently(c, 1) < 0)
+		return;
+
+	explore_to_depth(revs, c->generation);
+
+	for (p = c->parents; p; p = p->next) {
+		struct commit *parent = p->item;
+		int *pi = indegree_slab_at(&info->indegree, parent);
+
+		if (*pi)
+			(*pi)++;
+		else
+			*pi = 2;
+
+		test_flag_and_insert(&info->indegree_queue, parent, TOPO_WALK_INDEGREE);
+
+		if (revs->first_parent_only)
+			return;
+	}
+}
+
+static void compute_indegrees_to_depth(struct rev_info *revs,
+				       uint32_t gen_cutoff)
+{
+	struct topo_walk_info *info = revs->topo_walk_info;
+	struct commit *c;
+	while ((c = prio_queue_peek(&info->indegree_queue)) &&
+	       c->generation >= gen_cutoff)
+		indegree_walk_step(revs);
+}
 
 static void init_topo_walk(struct rev_info *revs)
 {
 	struct topo_walk_info *info;
+	struct commit_list *list;
 	revs->topo_walk_info = xmalloc(sizeof(struct topo_walk_info));
 	info = revs->topo_walk_info;
 	memset(info, 0, sizeof(struct topo_walk_info));
 
-	limit_list(revs);
-	sort_in_topological_order(&revs->commits, revs->sort_order);
+	init_indegree_slab(&info->indegree);
+	memset(&info->explore_queue, 0, sizeof(info->explore_queue));
+	memset(&info->indegree_queue, 0, sizeof(info->indegree_queue));
+	memset(&info->topo_queue, 0, sizeof(info->topo_queue));
+
+	switch (revs->sort_order) {
+	default: /* REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER */
+		info->topo_queue.compare = NULL;
+		break;
+	case REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE:
+		info->topo_queue.compare = compare_commits_by_commit_date;
+		break;
+	case REV_SORT_BY_AUTHOR_DATE:
+		init_author_date_slab(&info->author_date);
+		info->topo_queue.compare = compare_commits_by_author_date;
+		info->topo_queue.cb_data = &info->author_date;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	info->explore_queue.compare = compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date;
+	info->indegree_queue.compare = compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date;
+
+	info->min_generation = GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY;
+	for (list = revs->commits; list; list = list->next) {
+		struct commit *c = list->item;
+
+		if (parse_commit_gently(c, 1))
+			continue;
+
+		test_flag_and_insert(&info->explore_queue, c, TOPO_WALK_EXPLORED);
+		test_flag_and_insert(&info->indegree_queue, c, TOPO_WALK_INDEGREE);
+
+		if (c->generation < info->min_generation)
+			info->min_generation = c->generation;
+
+		*(indegree_slab_at(&info->indegree, c)) = 1;
+
+		if (revs->sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_AUTHOR_DATE)
+			record_author_date(&info->author_date, c);
+	}
+	compute_indegrees_to_depth(revs, info->min_generation);
+
+	for (list = revs->commits; list; list = list->next) {
+		struct commit *c = list->item;
+
+		if (*(indegree_slab_at(&info->indegree, c)) == 1)
+			prio_queue_put(&info->topo_queue, c);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * This is unfortunate; the initial tips need to be shown
+	 * in the order given from the revision traversal machinery.
+	 */
+	if (revs->sort_order == REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER)
+		prio_queue_reverse(&info->topo_queue);
 }
 
 static struct commit *next_topo_commit(struct rev_info *revs)
 {
-	return pop_commit(&revs->commits);
+	struct commit *c;
+	struct topo_walk_info *info = revs->topo_walk_info;
+
+	/* pop next off of topo_queue */
+	c = prio_queue_get(&info->topo_queue);
+
+	if (c)
+		*(indegree_slab_at(&info->indegree, c)) = 0;
+
+	return c;
 }
 
 static void expand_topo_walk(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
 {
-	if (process_parents(revs, commit, &revs->commits, NULL) < 0) {
+	struct commit_list *p;
+	struct topo_walk_info *info = revs->topo_walk_info;
+	if (process_parents(revs, commit, NULL, NULL) < 0) {
 		if (!revs->ignore_missing_links)
 			die("Failed to traverse parents of commit %s",
 			    oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid));
 	}
+
+	for (p = commit->parents; p; p = p->next) {
+		struct commit *parent = p->item;
+		int *pi;
+
+		if (parse_commit_gently(parent, 1) < 0)
+			continue;
+
+		if (parent->generation < info->min_generation) {
+			info->min_generation = parent->generation;
+			compute_indegrees_to_depth(revs, info->min_generation);
+		}
+
+		pi = indegree_slab_at(&info->indegree, parent);
+
+		(*pi)--;
+		if (*pi == 1)
+			prio_queue_put(&info->topo_queue, parent);
+
+		if (revs->first_parent_only)
+			return;
+	}
 }
 
 int prepare_revision_walk(struct rev_info *revs)
diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
index fd4154ff75..b0b3bb8025 100644
--- a/revision.h
+++ b/revision.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 #define USER_GIVEN	(1u<<25) /* given directly by the user */
 #define TRACK_LINEAR	(1u<<26)
 #define ALL_REV_FLAGS	(((1u<<11)-1) | USER_GIVEN | TRACK_LINEAR)
+#define TOPO_WALK_EXPLORED	(1u<<27)
+#define TOPO_WALK_INDEGREE	(1u<<28)
 
 #define DECORATE_SHORT_REFS	1
 #define DECORATE_FULL_REFS	2
-- 
2.19.1.542.gc4df23f792
Previous: Derrick StoleeNext: SZEDER Gábor
Message 81 of 87 in “Use generation numbers for --topo-order”
  1. 0/6 Use generation numbers for --topo-orderDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  2. 1/6 prio-queue: add 'peek' operationDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  3. 2/6 test-reach: add run_three_modes methodDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  4. 3/6 test-reach: add rev-list testsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  5. 4/6 revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  6. 5/6 commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoringDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  7. 6/6 revision.c: refactor basic topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 27, 2018
  8. Junio C HamanoAug 27, 2018
  9. 0/6 Use generation numbers for --topo-orderDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  10. 1/6 prio-queue: add 'peek' operationDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  11. 2/6 test-reach: add run_three_modes methodDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  12. SZEDER GáborSep 18, 2018
  13. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2018
  14. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2018
  15. Junio C HamanoSep 20, 2018
  16. 3/6 test-reach: add rev-list testsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  17. 4/6 revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  18. 5/6 commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoringDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  19. 6/6 revision.c: refactor basic topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2018
  20. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 18, 2018
  21. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 18, 2018
  22. Derrick StoleeSep 21, 2018
  23. 0/7 Use generation numbers for --topo-orderDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  24. 1/7 prio-queue: add 'peek' operationDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  25. Derrick StoleeSep 26, 2018
  26. Jeff KingOct 11, 2018
  27. 2/7 test-reach: add run_three_modes methodDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  28. Jeff KingOct 11, 2018
  29. 3/7 test-reach: add rev-list testsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  30. Jeff KingOct 11, 2018
  31. Junio C HamanoOct 12, 2018
  32. 4/7 revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  33. Jeff KingOct 11, 2018
  34. Junio C HamanoOct 12, 2018
  35. Derrick StoleeOct 12, 2018
  36. Johannes SixtOct 12, 2018
  37. Junio C HamanoOct 13, 2018
  38. 5/7 commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoringDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  39. Jeff KingOct 11, 2018
  40. 6/7 revision.h: add whitespace in flag definitionsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  41. 7/7 revision.c: refactor basic topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 21, 2018
  42. Derrick StoleeSep 27, 2018
  43. Jakub NarebskiOct 6, 2018
  44. Jeff KingOct 11, 2018
  45. Derrick StoleeOct 11, 2018
  46. Jeff KingOct 25, 2018
  47. Derrick StoleeOct 25, 2018
  48. Stefan BellerOct 11, 2018
  49. Junio C HamanoSep 21, 2018
  50. 0/7 Use generation numbers for --topo-orderDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  51. 1/7 prio-queue: add 'peek' operationDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  52. 3/7 test-reach: add rev-list testsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  53. Jakub NarebskiOct 21, 2018
  54. Derrick StoleeOct 21, 2018
  55. 4/7 revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logicDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  56. Jakub NarebskiOct 21, 2018
  57. Junio C HamanoOct 22, 2018
  58. Derrick StoleeOct 22, 2018
  59. revision.c: use new algorithm in A..B caseDerrick Stolee, Oct 22, 2018
  60. Junio C HamanoOct 25, 2018
  61. Jakub NarebskiOct 26, 2018
  62. 2/7 test-reach: add run_three_modes methodDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  63. 5/7 commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoringDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  64. Jakub NarebskiOct 21, 2018
  65. 6/7 revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithmDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  66. Jakub NarebskiOct 22, 2018
  67. Derrick StoleeOct 23, 2018
  68. Jakub NarebskiOct 26, 2018
  69. 7/7 t6012: make rev-list tests more interestingDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 16, 2018
  70. Jakub NarebskiOct 23, 2018
  71. Jakub NarebskiOct 21, 2018
  72. Junio C HamanoNov 1, 2018
  73. Derrick StoleeNov 1, 2018
  74. Junio C HamanoNov 1, 2018
  75. 0/7 Use generation numbers for --topo-orderDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  76. 1/7 prio-queue: add 'peek' operationDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  77. 2/7 test-reach: add run_three_modes methodDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  78. 3/7 test-reach: add rev-list testsDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  79. 4/7 revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logicDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  80. 5/7 commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoringDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  81. 6/7 revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithmDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018
  82. SZEDER GáborNov 1, 2018
  83. Derrick StoleeNov 1, 2018
  84. Mike HommeyNov 8, 2019
  85. Derrick StoleeNov 11, 2019
  86. SZEDER GáborNov 18, 2019
  87. 7/7 t6012: make rev-list tests more interestingDerrick Stolee, Nov 1, 2018

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.