Re: [PATCH] check-ref-format: require a repository for --branch
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 17, 2017, 07:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20171017073441.ovfhfnh5dsrbpxse@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqinfentiw.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
>> And in that spirit, I think the patch you replied with aims to go in >> the right direction, by providing the core functionality when in a >> repository while avoiding breaking such a script outside of one >> (though I do not understand it fully yet). > > Given that, is it safe for me to ignore this earlier one > >> For what it's worth, I don't agree with this repurposing of >> "check-ref-format --branch" at all. > > as reacting to the patch without reading what it does?
On second reading, yes, I was reacting to the discussion leading up to the patch instead of the patch. The patch looks good.
Sorry for the noise, Jonathan