Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pack-objects: Teach it to use reachability bitmap index when generating non-stdout pack too
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:28:02AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com> writes:
>
> > Another question: I'm preparing another version of "pack-objects: Teach
> > --use-bitmap-index codepath to respect --local ..." and was going to
> > put
> >
> > ( updated patch is in the end of this mail )
> >
> > in the top of the message. Is it ok or better not to do so and just respin
> > the patch in its own separate mail?
>
> That would force those who pick leftover bits to _open_ and read a
> first few lines.
>
> Definitely it is better than burying a patch after 60+ lines, but a
> separate patch with incremented "[PATCH v6 1/2]" on the subject line
> beats it hands-down from discoverability's point of view.
Thanks, I see. I've resent both patches as separate mails.