Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pack-objects: Teach it to use reachability bitmap index when generating non-stdout pack too
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2016, 18:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1t1zf74d.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160808181353.GC3995@teco.navytux.spb.ru>
Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Another question: I'm preparing another version of "pack-objects: Teach > --use-bitmap-index codepath to respect --local ..." and was going to > put > > ( updated patch is in the end of this mail ) > > in the top of the message. Is it ok or better not to do so and just respin > the patch in its own separate mail?
That would force those who pick leftover bits to _open_ and read a first few lines.
Definitely it is better than burying a patch after 60+ lines, but a separate patch with incremented "[PATCH v6 1/2]" on the subject line beats it hands-down from discoverability's point of view.