From: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:58:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pack-objects: Teach it to use reachability bitmap index when generating non-stdout pack too
Message-ID: <20160808185846.GE3995@teco.navytux.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1t1zf74d.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:28:02AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com> writes:
> 
> > Another question: I'm preparing another version of "pack-objects: Teach
> > --use-bitmap-index codepath to  respect --local ..." and was going to
> > put
> >
> >     ( updated patch is in the end of this mail )
> >
> > in the top of the message. Is it ok or better not to do so and just respin
> > the patch in its own separate mail?
> 
> That would force those who pick leftover bits to _open_ and read a
> first few lines.
> 
> Definitely it is better than burying a patch after 60+ lines, but a
> separate patch with incremented "[PATCH v6 1/2]" on the subject line
> beats it hands-down from discoverability's point of view.

Thanks, I see. I've resent both patches as separate mails.