Re: [PATCH] upload-pack.c: use of parse-options API
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 19, 2016, 11:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160519115725.GB3050@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <721240639.4127450.1463652631815.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:10:31PM +0200, Antoine Queru wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > I'm not sure whether it is worth hiding the first two options. We > > typically hide "internal" options like this for user-facing programs, so > > as not to clutter the "-h" output. But upload-pack isn't a user-facing > > program. Anybody who is calling it directly with "-h" may be interested > > in even its more esoteric options. > > In fact, to do this, I looked at builtin/receive-pack.c, where the parser API > was already implemented, and these first two options were hidden. There were > also no description for any options, so I thought it was not needed. Maybe we > could update this file too ?
Yeah, I don't think it's that bad to hide them, and perhaps consistency with receive-pack is better. AFAICT, descriptions for hidden options are pointless; they are never shown (in fact, it seems like OPT_HIDDEN_BOOL probably shouldn't even take such an option?).
But the non-hidden options _do_ need non-NULL descriptions.
-Peff