Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 06/11] remote.h: add get_remote_capabilities, request_capabilities

> >> The 'len > 4' check is needed because there's no guarantee that 'line'
> >> is NUL-terminated. Correct?
> >
> > I think this was just blindly copied from get_remote_heads(). And I
> > think that code was being overly paranoid. Ever since f3a3214 (Make
> > send/receive-pack be closer to doing something interesting, 2005-06-29),
> > the pkt-line reader will add an extra NUL to the buffer to ease cases
> > like this.
> 
> Thanks. I had started digging into packet_read() to determine whether
> it guaranteed NUL-termination, but didn't get far enough to decide. I
> agree that if NUL-termination is guaranteed, then the 'len > 4' check
> is superfluous (and confusing, which is why it caught my attention in
> the first place).