From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:48:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly
Message-ID: <20121025074829.GD15790@elie.Belkin>
In-Reply-To: <CAGdFq_j5sWsHwJY-rWP-XJ6cMF6uwSq=9beFe9ZuZyixBa1fVA@mail.gmail.com>

Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

> I know there was a reason why using UNINTERESTING didn't work
> (otherwise we could've used that to start with, instead of needing
> Junio's whence solution). I think all refs ended up being marked as
> UNINTERESTING or somesuch.

True.  Is it be possible to check UNINTERESTING in revs->cmdline
before the walk?