Re: [PATCH 03/13] transport-helper: factor out push_update_refs_status

From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 29, 2010, 21:36 UTC
Message-ID: <20100829213618.GD1890@burratino>
In-Reply-To: <1283053540-27042-4-git-send-email-srabbelier@gmail.com>

Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

Show 12 quoted lines

> +++ b/transport-helper.c
> @@ -554,6 +554,9 @@ static int fetch(struct transport *transport,
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> +static void push_update_refs_status(struct helper_data *data,
> +				       struct ref *remote_refs);
> +
>  static int push_refs_with_push(struct transport *transport,
>  		struct ref *remote_refs, int flags)
>  {
> @@ -609,8 +612,17 @@ static int push_refs_with_push(struct transport *transport,

[...]

Show 11 quoted lines

> +static void push_update_refs_status(struct helper_data *data,
> +				    struct ref *remote_refs)
> +{
> +	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +	struct ref *ref = remote_refs;
>  	while (1) {
>  		char *refname, *msg;
>  		int status;
> @@ -679,7 +691,7 @@ static int push_refs_with_push(struct transport *transport,
>  		ref->remote_status = msg;
>  	}

Hmm, I am not too happy with the long loop without explicit condition. Maybe it would make sense to split out the loop body as its own function? Something like

	struct ref *ref = remote_refs;
	for (;;) {
		recvline(data, &buf);
		if (!buf.len)
			break;

		push_update_ref_status(&buf, &ref, remote_refs);
	}

>  	strbuf_release(&buf);
> -	return 0;
> +	return;

Not necessary, I think.

>  }

Regardless, for what it's worth,

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Thanks for a pleasant read.