Re: [PATCH 3/5] refactor userdiff textconv code
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 24, 2008, 14:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081024140822.GA11612@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <4901D557.90106@viscovery.net>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 04:01:59PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Your reasoning makes sense, of course. (I thought that forgoing textconv > in these cases would have a simpler implementation; but it can't be a lot > simpler than yours.)
Yeah, I think preventing it entirely for this case would be much more complex, since you would have to realize much sooner that a textconv was going to happen.
> > +test_expect_failure 'textconv does not act on symlinks' ' > Can we trust your solution if you still have 'test_expect_failure' here? ;-)
Heh. It helps if I commit before format-patch. ;) Fortunately, this was the only change I missed out on sending.
-Peff