Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument
On Tuesday 2007 April 17 10:13, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> * Atomic commits. CVS makes it hard to get back to a consistant state
> in the past. What does it mean, for example to checkout revision 1.5
> of a project in CVS (hint: nothing, it's meaningfull for a file
> only).
>
> * Rename management.
>
> * Performance.
>
> * Perhaps your boss will be interested in the "data integrity" (i.e.
> git fsck) problem too.
Don't forget
* Can work offline
--
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com