From: Andy Parkins Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:26:47 GMT Subject: Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument Message-ID: <200704171126.48793.andyparkins@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On Tuesday 2007 April 17 10:13, Matthieu Moy wrote: > * Atomic commits. CVS makes it hard to get back to a consistant state > in the past. What does it mean, for example to checkout revision 1.5 > of a project in CVS (hint: nothing, it's meaningfull for a file > only). > > * Rename management. > > * Performance. > > * Perhaps your boss will be interested in the "data integrity" (i.e. > git fsck) problem too. Don't forget * Can work offline -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@gmail.com