Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument

From: Marcin Kasperski <marcin.kasperski@softax.pl>
Date: Apr 19, 2007, 12:42 UTC
Message-ID: <1176986559.30690.43.camel@cauchy.softax.local>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704191428360.8822@racer.site>

> > Google points to git.or.cz ;-)
> 
> How does Google point to something? You mean the last time you ran the 
> search, the top find _for you_ was git.or.cz?

Exactly. Searches for git documentation, git tutorial, git version control pointed there.

Show 5 quoted lines

> > I agree that git introduces plenty of excellent concepts. What it needs
> > is better docs (also, clearly known **SINGLE** master doc, just sth like
> > subversion book),
> 
> Does that mean you are volunteering?

No, as I do not have necessary knowledge. But I can volunteer to review one.

Show 6 quoted lines

> > cleaned command line interface (I feel that there are
> > just too many lowlevel commands visible for beginning user, maybe at
> > least one could split them into git-* for mere mortals and gitadm-* for
> > repository hackers),
> 
> Does that mean we can expect patches from you?

Not sure what is your point Johannes, but if you wanted to say that if somebody is not actively developing git, he should not make any comments regarding this, you could try doing this in a more straightforward manner.