Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument
- From
- J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2007, 14:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070419142733.GC4586@fieldses.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1176986559.30690.43.camel@cauchy.softax.local>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:42:39PM +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > > I agree that git introduces plenty of excellent concepts. What it needs > > > is better docs (also, clearly known **SINGLE** master doc, just sth like > > > subversion book), > > > > Does that mean you are volunteering? > > No, as I do not have necessary knowledge. But I can volunteer to review > one.
That would be great--see Documentation/user-manual.txt. (Or http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html.)
Patches welcomed, but so is general review. It's not my highest priority, unfortunately, so I may be a little slow to address comments, but I'll get to them eventually.
I don't expect it to ever be a *single* master doc--I still want to leave a lot of the details to the man pages, for example, and I expect there'll always be a need for some shortcut howto's and tutorials. I suppose we could include much of that into appendices some day if it helped findability.
--b.