Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument
- From
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
- Date
- Apr 18, 2007, 20:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070418205420.GC8524@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <200704181426.29969.andyparkins@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:26:17PM +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Wednesday 2007 April 18 13:40, Guilhem Bonnefille wrote: > > > An other point is that CVS/SVN actions for our developers are > > "trivial": update or commit, nothing more (even tags are made by > > > In my mind, git-svn or even git-svnserve, are THE tools to introduce > > Git in teams not convinced by the power of DVCS. Or perhaps someone > > will create a porcelain that offers the same simple interface of > > CVS/SVN and will integrate it in all the fantastic IDE ;-) > > It's already there. The git porcelain can do almost anything. If you were so > inclined you could write a fake svn command that translated all those calls > to git. > > svn add = git add > svn update = git pull > svn commit = git commit -a && git push
It's even possible to write those as git aliases, so you can have "git update" and "git ci" behave as cvs/svn users would expect.