Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument

From: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 19, 2007, 12:54 UTC
Message-ID: <46d6db660704190554l42ccae4ds861787939903ecb3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704191434240.8822@racer.site>

On 4/19/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:

> Oh, but it is true! That's personal experience. My typical answer: "You
> needed to reboot? What is a 'reboot'?"

I agree it was the case in the past.

Show 9 quoted lines

> > My experience (offtopic, I know):
> >
> > In one day, I actually reboot more often my qemu instances with my linux
> > test kernels than the current XP host crashes in a year.
>
> With a linux test kernel. Yeah, right. So, you compare an experimental
> test kernel -- which I gather you stress test? -- with an XP kernel where
> you probably do not even check mails while running QEmu, for fear that it
> crashes? *lol*!

let me rephrase:
- I run some test on about a kernel I regenerate about > 20 times
a day [I'm making a distro right now...]
- my host XP crashes less than 20 times in a year

I was not comparing both kernels: I would not be spending time on building a linux distro if I was not convinced linux is far superior :)

-- 
Christian