Re: New release?
- From
Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
- Date
- Jun 6, 2006, 16:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1149610100.23938.75.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vodx6zus2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 01:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The "next" queue has been shrinking, and nothing is going to > "maint" branch, which can mean only one thing ;-).
Junio,
If possible, I'd like to consider my (Linus') notion of the extension to the git protocol supplying the client hostname as part of a "standard" release like 1.4.0.
We don't necessarily have to agree on how it is used yet, but if we can get the protocol enhancement into this release, I think it would make for a good "flag day" sort of change.
Specifically, I'd like to consider the portion my patch that passes "\0HOST=%s\0" along with the git: protocol connection.
Any chance for that? If you'd like, I work on resubmitting just those bits with the connect function refactoring that you outlined.
Thanks, jdl