Re: New release?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jun 6, 2006, 15:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3beiux88.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0606061439500.28953@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> Also, what you talk about the "lazy clone" is a lot more involved than >> what Eric wanted to have. > > A little more involved. And I wanted to know what people think about this > way to tackle shallow clones.
This truly is a lot more involved, not because "lazy clone" is hard (which it is) but because what Eric wants to have is not to produce a shallow clone situation. The issue is about being able to fetch an object that is not listed as one of the refs the server side has, and it still will result in a fully connected repository.