Re: New release?

From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Date: Jun 6, 2006, 17:58 UTC
Message-ID: <1149616724.23938.85.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v3beitdct.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 12:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I think the virtual hosting of git-daemon is very important, and
> I do not want to have a half-baked one hurriedly cobbled
> together for 1.4.0 on the server side.

Agreed.

Show 6 quoted lines

> I do agree it is a good idea to have the client-side support in
> 1.4.0; that would work well with the current git-daemon.  Since
> the extension is backward compatible, we can tell the users to
> use 1.4.0 or later clients when the daemon side is done.  That
> is much nicer than telling them to use what's on "master" that
> is later than such-and-such commit.

Exactly.

Show 5 quoted lines

> > Any chance for that?  If you'd like, I work on resubmitting
> > just those bits with the connect function refactoring
> > that you outlined.
> 
> I appreciate the offer very much.

No problem.

>   Although I said port is
> something the server side can usually tell, I would throw in
> port there as well.

Can do.

>  Any reason to spell HOST in all uppercase by the way?

I would never suggest that it came to me from gittus in an IRC day-dream...? :-)

Consider it all lowercaseified instead.

jdl