From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:08:20 GMT
Subject: Re: New release?
Message-ID: <1149610100.23938.75.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vodx6zus2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 01:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The "next" queue has been shrinking, and nothing is going to
> "maint" branch, which can mean only one thing ;-).

Junio,

If possible, I'd like to consider my (Linus') notion
of the extension to the git protocol supplying the client
hostname as part of a "standard" release like 1.4.0.

We don't necessarily have to agree on how it is used yet,
but if we can get the protocol enhancement into this
release, I think it would make for a good "flag day"
sort of change.

Specifically, I'd like to consider the portion my patch
that passes "\0HOST=%s\0" along with the git: protocol
connection.

Any chance for that?  If you'd like, I work on resubmitting
just those bits with the connect function refactoring
that you outlined.

Thanks,
jdl