Re: [PATCH 2/6] remote-http(s): Support SOCKS proxies
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 27, 2015, 01:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqvb9tdr7v.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20151027012336.GK31271@freya.jamessan.com>
James McCoy <vega.james@gmail.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
>> The code looks OK but the last paragraph makes _us_ worried. What >> is the licensing status of the original at SO? > > According to Stackoverflow[0], > > As noted in the Stack Exchange Terms of Service[1] and in the footer of > every page, all user contributions are licensed under Creative Commons > Attribution-Share Alike[2]. Proper attribution[3] is required if you > republish any Stack Exchange content. > > [0]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing
Yes, and (please correct me if I am wrong--this is one of the times I hope I am wrong!) I thought BY-SA does not mesh well with GPLv2, in which case we cannot use this patch (instead somebody has to reimplement the same without copying).