Re: [PATCH 4/6] Squelch warning about an integer overflow

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> 
>> > We cannot rely on long integers to have more than 32 bits...
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>> > ---
>> 
>> Interesting.  8192 * 1024 * 1024 does not fit within 32-bit long, of
>> course.  Perhaps we can lose L after 1024 if we are explicitly
>> saying that the result ought to be size_t (which may be larger than
>> long)?
>
> Sure. But it would make the patch harder to read.
>
> Do you insist?