Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2021, #06; Mon, 25)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Oct 26, 2021, 21:28 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqv91jxyqe.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <e9bc367e-ae51-da1c-558e-6836922b0d0d@gmail.com>

Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

>>  Various operating modes of "git reset" have been made to work
>>  better with the sparse index.
>> 
>>  Needs review.
>
> This topic had good review in its first three versions, and the
> current v4 has had one response that doesn't seem to have actionable
> changes. Could you re-evaluate if the "needs review" label is still
> appropriate?

The label indeed does not read well. I know there was a lot of dicussions on v3 but in the list traffic, but I do not see anybody looked at v4 and said that the issues they pointed out in v3 are now covered to their satisfaction. Probably "Needs ack" may have shown what I meant better?

Thanks.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.