Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] BreakingChanges: document upcoming change from "sha1" to "sha256"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2024, 17:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtti8wruz.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <Zl682Dk6RcFOC2rA@framework>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> I agree that explicitly mentioning (1) and (3) is sensible. Is the > second one important though given that this is about the default when > creating _new_ repositories? I don't think interop code is a requirement > to make "sha256" the default, is it?
Let's drop (2) from the list, as I do not think there ever was a concensus on it, and also for the sake of brevity.
Thanks.